There is a debate going on
in this country that uses nature versus nurture
as an argument. It is the front runner of some of the most conservative
opinions. From this place it is easy to then start misrepresenting exactly what
nature is and what nurture is. It’s actually a biology versus psychology
essentially. In terms of human development,
it could apply to transgender individuals, homosexuality or even masculine and feminine
attributes. From the nature perspective, there are theories that human nature
and the chemical processes of the mind is what ultimately controls life style
choices. We are driven by the genetic programing that took millions of years to
create. Alternatively the is the nurture approach to how humans behave, and the
choices we make. To some the way some of those have been raised effect the kind
of adult they are meant to be. I’d like to look at both sides of these
arguments and see which I most agree with.
When speaking about nature and
sociology we’ve got to look at it subjectively. There are researchers who’ve
came up with multiple ways to explain how humans behave. We are mammals with
instincts and primal urges, essentially. Things we do naturally such as communicate
with body language, react to certain stimuli, and detect pheromones is
involuntary. When applying this to everyday social interaction there that every
nuance expected is some form of natural human behavior.
No comments:
Post a Comment